MrSnowflake wrote:Thanks for sharing mate.
I was thinking, with Google, not supporting widgets en dxTop supporting widgets, but being non-free, we might need to put our heads together to make our own library for making widgets. A more generic library for widgets would make it easier to support them in custom home apps and probably make it so that there are a lot more widgets (especially compared to dxTop, which probably won't get that much widgets). And (to come back to topic) that would neatly fit in your home!
MrSnowflake wrote:There are a couple of ways to go about this.
dxTop does it with Activities, so each widget is an Activity, but that might be pretty hard on resources.
MrSnowflake wrote:That would also work, but that has 2 problems:
1) I think starting (and running) an Activity uses much more resources than a WebView
2) There is a lot less security restrictions possible.
MrSnowflake wrote:haven't played with any of those yet, I don't have much time, I have a lot to do for school. Though when I have time, I'll try to make some comparisons between WebView and ActivityGroup.
Thanks, you might have saved me a couple of hours being frustrated . I'll let you know the results.pskink wrote:i found out a while ago that ActivityGroup can embedd only Activities with the same uid, and it requires the same key when signing: it can be problem here - but maybe i know too little about signing...
pls, let me know when you have some results
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 8 guests